The Goalkeeper Who Got Into Harvard on Match Footage
Frederik Hvillum
.jpg)
.jpg)
A high school goalkeeper built his Harvard recruiting video from match footage. Here's the system his coach set up to make it possible.
A goalkeeper recruiting video should be 3 to 5 minutes of match footage showing shot-stopping, distribution, decision-making, and composure. College coaches, including Ivy League programs, watch highlights first, then request full match footage for serious recruits. Here's how one public school goalkeeper in upstate New York used automated match recording to build a Harvard-quality reel without professional production, elite club backing, or dedicated staff.
Every college coach in America will tell you they want to see footage. What they don't always tell you is how hard it is to produce footage worth watching when you're a goalkeeper at a public high school in upstate New York with no dedicated camera operator, no analytics staff, and no budget for professional video.
That's the situation Garry Preece's players were in before he changed it.
Preece has coached varsity soccer at Ballston Spa High School for 16 years while teaching math, running the department, and coaching the local U8 club program on weekends. He is not a coach with resources. He is a coach with a camera, a phone hotspot, and 16 years of understanding what players need to get seen.
One of his goalkeepers got into Harvard. This is how.
Why do college coaches prefer video over showcase tournaments?
The showcase model has a fundamental problem: a goalkeeper is only as visible as the game allows. If the game is low-stakes, the shots are comfortable, and nothing difficult comes their way, 90 minutes produces nothing useful for a recruiter. The player was there. The coach watched. There is no evidence.
Video solves the visibility problem at its root. A goalkeeper who has recorded every match across a season has documentation of every difficult decision, every distribution under pressure, every reflex save and every moment they organised the defence in front of them. The footage exists regardless of whether a college coach was in the stands.
For Ivy League programs in particular, this matters more than it might seem. Harvard soccer coaches are not attending games in suburban New York. They are evaluating players remotely, through footage, and making judgments about technical quality, decision-making, and composure based on what they can see on screen.
A player without footage is invisible to that process. A player with well-organised footage from real match situations is not.

What did the goalkeeper's recruiting video actually include?
Preece describes watching his goalkeeper build the reel. It was not just a compilation of saves.
"He did a lot of diving saves, but also solid passes and the decision making that he made. So he used both. He used the game film for good saves and good decision making, good passing."
That combination is significant. Harvard's coaches were not evaluating a highlights package. They were evaluating a footballer who happened to play goalkeeper, someone who could read the game, distribute intelligently, and make sound decisions under pressure. The footage gave them evidence of all three.
This is the shift that separates effective recruiting video from ineffective recruiting video. Spectacular saves catch attention. Decision-making and passing under pressure build the case that a player belongs at the next level. The goalkeeper understood that distinction and built his reel accordingly.
How did a public school coach give his goalkeeper that advantage?
Preece set up a system that gave every player in his program access to their own footage without requiring staff time to produce it.
"You just turn it on and it goes. You just gotta make sure you have a hotspot on your phone and get your internet to work, and you're all set to go. The whole game goes, you don't do anything. It follows the game everywhere."
Once the match footage was uploaded, players could access it themselves. They could create accounts, review their own clips, and build their own highlight reels. The coach did not need to produce the recruiting video. The player did it using footage that already existed.
That independence matters. A goalkeeper who can review their own performance, identify their strongest moments, and assemble them into a coherent case for a college coach is developing exactly the kind of analytical self-awareness that elite programmes are looking for in the first place.
How has video changed the geography of college soccer recruiting?
The conventional assumption in US college soccer is that elite recruitment flows through elite club programs, expensive showcases, and the network of coaches who attend them. Players outside that network, at public high schools in smaller towns, have historically faced a structural disadvantage that had nothing to do with their ability.
Video is changing that assumption.
Preece's goalkeeper was not discovered at a showcase. He was evaluated through footage he had assembled himself from a public school program in Saratoga County. The footage was good because the system that produced it was good, and because the player knew how to use it.
"Since I started using it, I think almost every school in the suburban council, I'd say 95% of them are using Veo now, and the basketball programs and lacrosse programs too."
When every program in a conference has access to consistent, high-quality footage, the playing field changes. Players who would previously have been invisible to college coaches become visible. The ones who know how to document their own performance have the advantage.
.jpg)
How does Veo support goalkeeper recruiting specifically?
Veo's AI camera films from an elevated position and tracks play automatically across the full pitch. For goalkeepers, this means the camera captures not just shot-stopping moments but the full context around them: the build-up that created the shot, the communication before a set piece, the distribution that follows a save.
That wider frame is what separates useful recruiting footage from a clips package. A college coach watching a goalkeeper through Veo footage sees the player in their full environment, making decisions in real time, organising defenders, and reading the game as it develops.
The platform also allows players to create highlight reels directly from match footage, selecting clips, trimming sequences, and building a shareable profile that can be sent to college coaches as a link. No professional editing required. The goalkeeper at Ballston Spa built his Harvard application material using footage his coach had already recorded.
More than 40,000 clubs across 100 countries use Veo to document player performance and support recruiting (Veo data, 2026).
See how Veo's Player Profile lets players build and share a recruiting reel directly from match footage
What do Ivy League coaches look for in a goalkeeper's recruiting video?
Based on what worked at Ballston Spa, and what the footage itself needs to demonstrate, effective goalkeeper recruiting video covers four areas:
Shot-stopping. Diving saves, reflex stops, and command in the air establish the baseline. These are the moments that demonstrate whether the goalkeeper has the technical level the program needs.
Distribution. How a goalkeeper passes under pressure, whether they can play with their feet and drive build-up from the back, has become increasingly important at every level of the game.
Decision-making. Coming for crosses, choosing when to stay on the line, managing the defensive shape in front of them. These decisions reveal game intelligence that raw athleticism cannot replace.
Composure after errors. A goalkeeper who resets quickly after conceding, who communicates clearly and maintains their focus, is demonstrating a psychological quality that coaches at the highest level specifically look for.
The goal is not a showreel. It is evidence of a complete player, documented across enough matches to show that the quality is consistent and not accidental.
%20(1).jpg)
FAQs
Most Division I coaches watch highlights first to assess technical level, then request full match footage for players they are seriously considering. Having both available, a polished highlight reel and access to complete matches, puts a player in the strongest possible position.
Three to five minutes is the standard recommendation. Long enough to show range across multiple situations, short enough to hold a coach's attention. Front-load the strongest material. Coaches make judgments quickly and the first 60 seconds carry disproportionate weight.
Junior year is the conventional answer, but building the habit of reviewing and saving strong clips from sophomore year means a player has more material to work with when it matters. The best recruiting videos are assembled from a season or more of consistent documentation, not rushed together in the months before applications open.
Yes, though the pathway requires both the academic profile and the athletic quality that Ivy League programs demand. Video helps with the athletic documentation. Players who can demonstrate consistent technical level, good decision-making, and composure across a full season of footage are competitive regardless of which program they play for.
.jpeg)
.jpg)

.jpg)